01132014Headline:

Backward India Gay Sex Ban

The Supreme Court in India has dealt a major  blow to the country’s gay and lesbian community, reimposing a British  colonial-era ban on gay sex that was ruled unconstitutional four years ago.

The verdict overturns a 2009 Delhi  High Court judgment that ruled that Section 377 of the Indian criminal code,  which bans “carnal intercourse against the order of nature” and has been held to  mean homosexual sex, was a violation of the fundamental constitutional rights of  gays and lesbians.

The Supreme Court’s ruling on Wednesday found the Delhi High Court judgment  was “constitutionally unsustainable”, and that it is up to India’s parliament to  decide if it wanted to decriminalise gay sex.

Civil rights attorneys and gay rights activists expressed shock and anger at  the ruling, which will again make gay sexual encounters between consenting  adults a criminal offence, as it was treated before 2009.

“It’s totally retrograde, totally shocking,” Colin Gonsalves, a prominent  human rights attorney, said of the decision. “The role of the Supreme Court is  to ensure fundamental rights, and it’s an abdication of the role of the Supreme  Court.”

Indira Jaisingh, the government’s additional solicitor general, said the  court’s decision reflects “the medieval mindset of the people of this  country”.

While fully-fledged criminal prosecutions under Section 377 were rare even  before 2009, activists said the prohibition on gay sex was frequently used to  harass or blackmail gays, contributing to a climate of fear within the  community.

Attorney Anand Grover, one of the lawyers who has led the legal battle to  have Section 377 struck from the rule books, said activists will apply for a  review of the Supreme Court verdict.

“We have legal avenues open to us and we will pursue them,” he said. “I’m  confident we will win ultimately. We have a just cause, and we will use every  means necessary to be sure we get our rights.”

Ms Jaisingh criticised Wednesday’s ruling as “an abdication of duty” by a  Supreme Court that has aggressively insisted on its right to review – and  overturn – all types of government policies, even when the matters have no  constitutional issue at stake.

On a question of fundamental human rights, of which the court should be “the  final interpreter”, she said, “they prefer to put the ball back in the court of  parliament.”

“It’s an erroneous interpretation of the constitution of India: every human  being has [the] right to live their life the way they want to live it,” Ms  Jaisingh said. “It is not only disappointing but it is almost contradictory to  the constitution of India.”

India’s  gay community fought in court for more than a decade to overturn the British  colonial-era Section 377, led by the Naz Foundation, an organisation that  promotes safe sex practices among gay men to reduce their risk of contracting  HIV/Aids.

But India’s Congress-led government has been reluctant to  take a firm stand on the issue. The health ministry, which has extensive  programmes to combat  HIV/Aids, supported gay groups, arguing that the ban on same sex lovemaking  hindered efforts to reach out to gay men at high risk of contracting HIV. But  the conservative interior ministry argued that overturning the ban would  threaten the social order.

However, after the 2009 Delhi High Court judgment, seen then as a landmark in  the struggle for gay rights, the Congress-led government told the Supreme Court  that it did not see any problem in the verdict, despite the clamour from  religious groups – including Hindus, Muslims and Christians – against the  ruling.

Gay rights activists said there was little prospect of parliament striking  down the colonial-era law, especially in the months ahead of Parliamentary  elections, but vowed to continue their legal battle through the court process. “The government operates on the basis of majority opinion,” said Ashok Rao Kavi,  a prominent gay rights activist based in Mumbai. “We are demanding our rights  from the state. It’s the duty of the state to treat all people equally.”

Daily Sun Headlines: Have a small business using antiquated technology? Please go to this website and learn more about how technology innovation is improving small businesses everywhere. Learn more at the website.

Tags: 










What Next?

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

You must be Logged in to post comment.